tcml@tcml.pupman.com

Tesla Coil Mailing List

View all threads

inductors for DC charging

LJ
Lux, Jim
Sun, Feb 12, 2023 4:54 PM

Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
charging inductor for a small coil?

They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got the
HV insulation.

I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to
about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the
actual charging current, etc.)

Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV?
Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with
mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage
rating, reasonable, but that's doable.

Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a charging inductor for a small coil? They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got the HV insulation. I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the actual charging current, etc.) Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV? Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage rating, reasonable, but that's doable.
JT
Joshua Thomas
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 10:58 AM

Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) that
I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
charging inductor for a small coil?

They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got the
HV insulation.

I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to
about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the
actual charging current, etc.)

Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV?
Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with
mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage
rating, reasonable, but that's doable.


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Joshua Thomas

My new email address is: joshuafthomas@gmail.com
Please update your information if you have not already done so.

Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) that I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done. On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a > charging inductor for a small coil? > > They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got the > HV insulation. > > I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem to > have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving > from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to > about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the > actual charging current, etc.) > > Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV? > Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with > mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage > rating, reasonable, but that's doable. > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > -- Joshua Thomas My new email address is: joshuafthomas@gmail.com Please update your information if you have not already done so.
LJ
Lux, Jim
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 1:20 PM

On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) that
I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done.

There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running off
110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
charging inductor for a small coil?

They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got the
HV insulation.

I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to
about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the
actual charging current, etc.)

Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV?
Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with
mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage
rating, reasonable, but that's doable.


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) that > I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done. There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a >> charging inductor for a small coil? >> >> They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got the >> HV insulation. >> >> I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem to >> have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving >> from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to >> about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the >> actual charging current, etc.) >> >> Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV? >> Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with >> mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage >> rating, reasonable, but that's doable. >> _______________________________________________ >> Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com >>
JT
Joshua Thomas
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 3:54 PM

That sounds pretty neat, Jim. Do you have any links or sources? Thanks in
advance :)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 8:21 AM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled)

that

I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done.

There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running off
110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
charging inductor for a small coil?

They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got the
HV insulation.

I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to
about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the
actual charging current, etc.)

Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV?
Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with
mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage
rating, reasonable, but that's doable.


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Joshua Thomas

My new email address is: joshuafthomas@gmail.com
Please update your information if you have not already done so.

That sounds pretty neat, Jim. Do you have any links or sources? Thanks in advance :) On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 8:21 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > > Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) > that > > I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done. > > > There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running off > 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > > > >> Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a > >> charging inductor for a small coil? > >> > >> They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got the > >> HV insulation. > >> > >> I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem to > >> have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving > >> from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to > >> about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the > >> actual charging current, etc.) > >> > >> Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV? > >> Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with > >> mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage > >> rating, reasonable, but that's doable. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > >> To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > >> > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > -- Joshua Thomas My new email address is: joshuafthomas@gmail.com Please update your information if you have not already done so.
J
jimlux
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 6:45 PM

On 2/13/23 7:54 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

That sounds pretty neat, Jim. Do you have any links or sources? Thanks in
advance :)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 8:21 AM

archives search for GMHEICSLR

https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/1998/November/msg00537.html

https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/2000/August/msg00281.html with the
classic TC experimenter line: "I got maybe half a dozen
good hot 6" discharges from it before the coil died in a orange-ish
flash of light."

in the post after that one (you should definitely follow the threads),
Sam Barros's website is different now:
https://power-labs.com/gmheicslr/

https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/2000/December/msg01207.html

This seems to be one of the less expensive versions of that coil on
Amazon  - TBH I don't know if it's hei - it's apparently for American
Motors cars, but the form factor is right.

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Walker-Products-920-1003-Ignition-Coil&crid=18LG4U2WSFC40&sprefix=walker-products-920-1003-ignition-coil

I'm sure you could find it cheaper on alibaba or something.

(ThunderSpark(r), how can you go wrong with a brand name like that)

https://www.truckid.com/1983-gmc-b-series-ignition-parts/walker-products-ignition-coil-4305475413.html
seems to be similar (but out of stock)

Walker has a website, but not much technical data on the coils...

On 2/13/23 7:54 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > That sounds pretty neat, Jim. Do you have any links or sources? Thanks in > advance :) > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 8:21 AM archives search for GMHEICSLR https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/1998/November/msg00537.html https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/2000/August/msg00281.html with the classic TC experimenter line: "I got maybe half a dozen good hot 6" discharges from it before the coil died in a orange-ish flash of light." in the post after that one (you should definitely follow the threads), Sam Barros's website is different now: https://power-labs.com/gmheicslr/ https://www.pupman.com/listarchives/2000/December/msg01207.html This seems to be one of the less expensive versions of that coil on Amazon - TBH I don't know if it's hei - it's apparently for American Motors cars, but the form factor is right. https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Walker-Products-920-1003-Ignition-Coil&crid=18LG4U2WSFC40&sprefix=walker-products-920-1003-ignition-coil I'm sure you could find it cheaper on alibaba or something. (ThunderSpark(r), how can you go wrong with a brand name like that) https://www.truckid.com/1983-gmc-b-series-ignition-parts/walker-products-ignition-coil-4305475413.html seems to be similar (but out of stock) Walker has a website, but not much technical data on the coils...
BH
Bert Hickman
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 7:25 PM

Hi Jim,
I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging
chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very
attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging
current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum output
power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and
heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, most
HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC
resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following calculations,
I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging
circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type
modulator circuit).
In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank
cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For
comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC
resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal
system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV),
the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power at
250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor resistance
reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves performance.
Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance of
10 k ohm and 30 H respectively.
Case 1: Example ignition coil:
Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS
Max break rate:  412 BPS
RMS charging current:  ~ 49 mA  (250 BPS)
Ignition coil ohmic dissipation:  23.9 W
Tank cap max voltage:  ~13.9 kV  (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!)
Bang size: 1.71 J
Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal)
Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD
ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105
([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has less
than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also
assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H).
Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil:
Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS
Max break rate:  414 BPS
RMS charging current:  ~ 75 mA
Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W
Tank cap max voltage:  ~16.23 kV  (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!)
Bang size:  2.63 J
Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal)
The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. Let's
try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the
results.
Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel
Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
Max break rate:  586 BPS
RMS charging current:  ~ 83 mA  (250 BPS)
Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W
Tank cap max voltage:  ~17.16 kV  (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!)
Bang size:  2.94 J
Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal)
Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is
shown below...
Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke
Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
Max break rate:  587 BPS
RMS charging current:  ~ 106 mA  (250 BPS)
Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W
Tank cap max voltage:  ~19.38kV  (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!)
Bang size:  3.76 J
Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal)
So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as
charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation
issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to
sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging
system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help to
prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to
handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. You
could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a
secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the expected
RMS current in the charging system.
Bert
Lux, Jim wrote:

 On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

 Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil
 filled) that
 I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have
 done.

 There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running
 off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

 On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com>
 wrote:

 Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
 charging inductor for a small coil?
 They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got
 the
 HV insulation.
 I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
 have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
 from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out
 to
 about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of
 the
 actual charging current, etc.)
 Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off
 20kV?
 Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core
 with
 mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the
 voltage
 rating, reasonable, but that's doable.
 _______________________________________________
 Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

 _______________________________________________
 Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering LLC
Woodridge, Illinois, USA
[7]http://www.capturedlightning.com
+1 630-964-2699


World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures,
magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books


References

  1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1
  2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com
  3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
  4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
  5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
  6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
  7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/
Hi Jim, I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum output power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, most HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following calculations, I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type modulator circuit). In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV), the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power at 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor resistance reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves performance. Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance of 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively. Case 1: Example ignition coil: Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS Max break rate: 412 BPS RMS charging current: ~ 49 mA (250 BPS) Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 23.9 W Tank cap max voltage: ~13.9 kV (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!) Bang size: 1.71 J Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal) Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105 ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has less than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H). Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil: Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS Max break rate: 414 BPS RMS charging current: ~ 75 mA Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W Tank cap max voltage: ~16.23 kV (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!) Bang size: 2.63 J Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal) The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. Let's try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the results. Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: Max break rate: 586 BPS RMS charging current: ~ 83 mA (250 BPS) Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W Tank cap max voltage: ~17.16 kV (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!) Bang size: 2.94 J Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal) Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is shown below... Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: Max break rate: 587 BPS RMS charging current: ~ 106 mA (250 BPS) Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W Tank cap max voltage: ~19.38kV (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!) Bang size: 3.76 J Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal) So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help to prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. You could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the expected RMS current in the charging system. Bert Lux, Jim wrote: On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil filled) that I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have done. There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a charging inductor for a small coil? They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got the HV insulation. I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem to have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out to about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of the actual charging current, etc.) Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off 20kV? Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core with mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the voltage rating, reasonable, but that's doable. _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com -- Bert Hickman Stoneridge Engineering LLC Woodridge, Illinois, USA [7]http://www.capturedlightning.com +1 630-964-2699 *********************************************************************** World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures, magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books *********************************************************************** References 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/
LJ
Lux, Jim
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 8:14 PM

On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote:

 Hi Jim,
 I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging
 chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very
 attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging
 current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum output
 power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and
 heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, most
 HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC
 resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following calculations,
 I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging
 circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type
 modulator circuit).
 In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank
 cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For
 comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC
 resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal
 system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV),
 the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power at
 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor resistance
 reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves performance.

This is sort of where I wound up.  My application is running 7 small
coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a
common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that)

I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be
so bad in this application. And it's cheap!

 Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance of
 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively.
 Case 1: Example ignition coil:
 Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  412 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 49 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation:  23.9 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~13.9 kV  (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size: 1.71 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal)

If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core)
losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation
properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not)

 Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD
 ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105
 ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has less
 than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also
 assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H).
 Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil:
 Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  414 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 75 mA
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~16.23 kV  (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.63 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal)

yes - lower series R helps

 The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. Let's
 try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the
 results.
 Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel
 Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  586 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 83 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~17.16 kV  (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.94 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal)
 Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is
 shown below...
 Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke
 Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  587 BPS
 RMS charging current:  ~ 106 mA  (250 BPS)
 Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~19.38kV  (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  3.76 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal)
 So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as
 charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation
 issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to
 sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging
 system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help to
 prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to
 handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. You
 could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a
 secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the expected
 RMS current in the charging system.

Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation
properties.

The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on
the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be
misremembering.

One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's
not a closed circuit any more.

If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting.

I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every
day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the
gap) to work is, eh, tricky.

There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has
one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this.

 Bert
 Lux, Jim wrote:

   On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

   Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil
   filled) that
   I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have
   done.

   There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running
   off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

   On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com>
   wrote:

   Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
   charging inductor for a small coil?
   They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got
   the
   HV insulation.
   I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem to
   have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
   from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out
   to
   about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of
   the
   actual charging current, etc.)
   Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off
   20kV?
   Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core
   with
   mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the
   voltage
   rating, reasonable, but that's doable.
   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering LLC
Woodridge, Illinois, USA
[7]http://www.capturedlightning.com
+1 630-964-2699


World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures,
magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books


References

 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1
 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com
 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/

Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote: > Hi Jim, > I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging > chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very > attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging > current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum output > power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and > heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, most > HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC > resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following calculations, > I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging > circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type > modulator circuit). > In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank > cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For > comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC > resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal > system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV), > the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power at > 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor resistance > reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves performance. This is sort of where I wound up.  My application is running 7 small coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that) I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be so bad in this application. And it's cheap! > Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance of > 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively. > Case 1: Example ignition coil: > Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS > Max break rate: 412 BPS > RMS charging current: ~ 49 mA (250 BPS) > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 23.9 W > Tank cap max voltage: ~13.9 kV (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!) > Bang size: 1.71 J > Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal) If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core) losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not) > Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD > ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105 > ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has less > than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also > assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H). > Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil: > Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS > Max break rate: 414 BPS > RMS charging current: ~ 75 mA > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W > Tank cap max voltage: ~16.23 kV (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!) > Bang size: 2.63 J > Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal) yes - lower series R helps > The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. Let's > try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the > results. > Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel > Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > Max break rate: 586 BPS > RMS charging current: ~ 83 mA (250 BPS) > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W > Tank cap max voltage: ~17.16 kV (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!) > Bang size: 2.94 J > Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal) > Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is > shown below... > Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke > Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > Max break rate: 587 BPS > RMS charging current: ~ 106 mA (250 BPS) > Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W > Tank cap max voltage: ~19.38kV (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!) > Bang size: 3.76 J > Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal) > So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as > charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation > issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to > sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging > system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help to > prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to > handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. You > could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a > secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the expected > RMS current in the charging system. Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation properties. The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be misremembering. One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's not a closed circuit any more. If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting. I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the gap) to work is, eh, tricky. There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this. > Bert > Lux, Jim wrote: > > On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > > Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil > filled) that > I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have > done. > > There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running > off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com> > wrote: > > Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a > charging inductor for a small coil? > They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got > the > HV insulation. > I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem to > have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving > from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works out > to > about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of > the > actual charging current, etc.) > Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off > 20kV? > Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core > with > mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the > voltage > rating, reasonable, but that's doable. > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > -- > Bert Hickman > Stoneridge Engineering LLC > Woodridge, Illinois, USA > [7]http://www.capturedlightning.com > +1 630-964-2699 > *********************************************************************** > World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures, > magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books > *********************************************************************** > > References > > 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1 > 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com > 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com >
CR
charles rakes
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 9:01 PM

I believe it was way back in the 90 I had an article published in Popular
Electronics about a dc coil using two ignition coils.  It was also on the
magazine’s front cover.  Charles Rakes

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:43 PM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote:

 Hi Jim,
 I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging
 chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very
 attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging
 current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum

output

 power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and
 heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison,

most

 HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC
 resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following

calculations,

 I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging
 circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type
 modulator circuit).
 In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank
 cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For
 comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC
 resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal
 system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV),
 the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power

at

 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor

resistance

 reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves

performance.

This is sort of where I wound up.  My application is running 7 small
coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a
common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that)

I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be
so bad in this application. And it's cheap!

 Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance

of

 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively.
 Case 1: Example ignition coil:
 Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  412 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 49 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation:  23.9 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~13.9 kV  (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size: 1.71 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal)

If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core)
losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation
properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not)

 Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD
 ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105
 ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has

less

 than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also
 assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H).
 Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil:
 Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  414 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 75 mA
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~16.23 kV  (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.63 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal)

yes - lower series R helps

 The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil.

Let's

 try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the
 results.
 Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel
 Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  586 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 83 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~17.16 kV  (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.94 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal)
 Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is
 shown below...
 Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke
 Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  587 BPS
 RMS charging current:  ~ 106 mA  (250 BPS)
 Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~19.38kV  (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  3.76 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal)
 So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as
 charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation
 issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to
 sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging
 system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help

to

 prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to
 handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples.

You

 could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a
 secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the

expected

 RMS current in the charging system.

Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation
properties.

The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on
the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be
misremembering.

One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's
not a closed circuit any more.

If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting.

I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every
day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the
gap) to work is, eh, tricky.

There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has
one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this.

 Bert
 Lux, Jim wrote:

   On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

   Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil
   filled) that
   I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have
   done.

   There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running
   off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

   On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com>
   wrote:

   Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a
   charging inductor for a small coil?
   They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've got
   the
   HV insulation.
   I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem

to

   have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving
   from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works

out

   to
   about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of
   the
   actual charging current, etc.)
   Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off
   20kV?
   Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core
   with
   mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the
   voltage
   rating, reasonable, but that's doable.
   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering LLC
Woodridge, Illinois, USA
[7]http://www.capturedlightning.com
+1 630-964-2699


World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures,
magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books


References

 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1
 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com
 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/

Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

I believe it was way back in the 90 I had an article published in Popular Electronics about a dc coil using two ignition coils. It was also on the magazine’s front cover. Charles Rakes On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:43 PM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging > > chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very > > attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the charging > > current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum > output > > power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and > > heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, > most > > HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC > > resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following > calculations, > > I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging > > circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a line-type > > modulator circuit). > > > In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, tank > > cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For > > comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC > > resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an ideal > > system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 kV), > > the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power > at > > 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor > resistance > > reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves > performance. > > This is sort of where I wound up. My application is running 7 small > coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a > common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that) > > > I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be > so bad in this application. And it's cheap! > > > > > > Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance > of > > 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively. > > Case 1: Example ignition coil: > > Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS > > Max break rate: 412 BPS > > RMS charging current: ~ 49 mA (250 BPS) > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 23.9 W > > Tank cap max voltage: ~13.9 kV (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > Bang size: 1.71 J > > Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal) > > If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core) > losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation > properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not) > > > > > Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD > > ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105 > > ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has > less > > than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also > > assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H). > > Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil: > > Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS > > Max break rate: 414 BPS > > RMS charging current: ~ 75 mA > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W > > Tank cap max voltage: ~16.23 kV (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > Bang size: 2.63 J > > Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal) > > > > > yes - lower series R helps > > > The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. > Let's > > try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the > > results. > > Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel > > Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > > Max break rate: 586 BPS > > RMS charging current: ~ 83 mA (250 BPS) > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W > > Tank cap max voltage: ~17.16 kV (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > Bang size: 2.94 J > > Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal) > > Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is > > shown below... > > Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke > > Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > > Max break rate: 587 BPS > > RMS charging current: ~ 106 mA (250 BPS) > > Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W > > Tank cap max voltage: ~19.38kV (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > Bang size: 3.76 J > > Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal) > > So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used as > > charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation > > issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages to > > sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant charging > > system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help > to > > prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able to > > handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. > You > > could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a > > secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the > expected > > RMS current in the charging system. > > Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation > properties. > > The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on > the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be > misremembering. > > One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's > not a closed circuit any more. > > > If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting. > > I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every > day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the > gap) to work is, eh, tricky. > > There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has > one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this. > > > > > > > Bert > > Lux, Jim wrote: > > > > On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > > > > Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil > > filled) that > > I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others have > > done. > > > > There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running > > off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com> > > wrote: > > > > Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as a > > charging inductor for a small coil? > > They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've got > > the > > HV insulation. > > I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem > to > > have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're driving > > from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works > out > > to > > about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model of > > the > > actual charging current, etc.) > > Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off > > 20kV? > > Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core > > with > > mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the > > voltage > > rating, reasonable, but that's doable. > > _______________________________________________ > > Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > > -- > > Bert Hickman > > Stoneridge Engineering LLC > > Woodridge, Illinois, USA > > [7]http://www.capturedlightning.com > > +1 630-964-2699 > > *********************************************************************** > > World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures, > > magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books > > *********************************************************************** > > > > References > > > > 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1 > > 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com > > 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com >
RR
Ronald Reeland
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 11:17 PM

Here are a couple links to the Popular Electronics November 1999 issue
featuring Charles Rakes Tesla Coil article and plans:

https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Poptronics/90s/99/PE.1999-11.pdf

https://teslauniverse.com/build/plans/solid-state-tesla-coil-0

Ron Reeland

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:52 PM charles rakes crakes29@gmail.com wrote:

I believe it was way back in the 90 I had an article published in Popular
Electronics about a dc coil using two ignition coils.  It was also on the
magazine’s front cover.  Charles Rakes

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:43 PM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote:

 Hi Jim,
 I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging
 chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very
 attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the

charging

 current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum

output

 power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and
 heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison,

most

 HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC
 resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following

calculations,

 I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging
 circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a

line-type

 modulator circuit).
 In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV,

tank

 cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For
 comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC
 resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an

ideal

 system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20

kV),

 the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power

at

 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor

resistance

 reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves

performance.

This is sort of where I wound up.  My application is running 7 small
coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a
common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that)

I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be
so bad in this application. And it's cheap!

 Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance

of

 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively.
 Case 1: Example ignition coil:
 Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  412 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 49 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation:  23.9 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~13.9 kV  (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size: 1.71 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal)

If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core)
losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation
properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not)

 Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD
 ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105
 ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has

less

 than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also
 assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H).
 Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil:
 Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS
 Max break rate:  414 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 75 mA
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~16.23 kV  (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.63 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal)

yes - lower series R helps

 The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil.

Let's

 try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the
 results.
 Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel
 Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  586 BPS
 RMS charging current:   ~ 83 mA  (250 BPS)
 Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~17.16 kV  (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  2.94 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal)
 Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is
 shown below...
 Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke
 Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS:
 Max break rate:  587 BPS
 RMS charging current:  ~ 106 mA  (250 BPS)
 Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W
 Tank cap max voltage:  ~19.38kV  (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!)
 Bang size:  3.76 J
 Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal)
 So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used

as

 charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation
 issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages

to

 sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant

charging

 system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help

to

 prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able

to

 handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples.

You

 could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a
 secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the

expected

 RMS current in the charging system.

Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation
properties.

The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on
the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be
misremembering.

One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's
not a closed circuit any more.

If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting.

I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every
day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the
gap) to work is, eh, tricky.

There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has
one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this.

 Bert
 Lux, Jim wrote:

   On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote:

   Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil
   filled) that
   I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others

have

   done.

   There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running
   off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall.

   On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com>
   wrote:

   Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as

a

   charging inductor for a small coil?
   They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.)  They've

got

   the
   HV insulation.
   I was wondering about the current handling.  Typically, they seem

to

   have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're

driving

   from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works

out

   to
   about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model

of

   the
   actual charging current, etc.)
   Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off
   20kV?
   Short of winding my own.  200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core
   with
   mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the
   voltage
   rating, reasonable, but that's doable.
   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

   _______________________________________________
   Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com
   To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

--
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering LLC
Woodridge, Illinois, USA
[7]http://www.capturedlightning.com
+1 630-964-2699


World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures,
magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books


References

 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1
 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com
 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com
 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com
 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/

Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com


Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com
To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com

Here are a couple links to the Popular Electronics November 1999 issue featuring Charles Rakes Tesla Coil article and plans: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Poptronics/90s/99/PE.1999-11.pdf https://teslauniverse.com/build/plans/solid-state-tesla-coil-0 Ron Reeland On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:52 PM charles rakes <crakes29@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe it was way back in the 90 I had an article published in Popular > Electronics about a dc coil using two ignition coils. It was also on the > magazine’s front cover. Charles Rakes > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:43 PM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > > > On 2/13/23 11:25 AM, Bert Hickman wrote: > > > Hi Jim, > > > I'm not aware of anyone trying to use ignition coils as charging > > > chokes. Their high inductance and operating voltages are very > > > attractive. However, the high DC resistance will reduce the > charging > > > current, maximum voltage of the tank cap, bang size and maximum > > output > > > power. In addition, there may be concerns with current-handling and > > > heating in the ignition coil, and core saturation. For comparison, > > most > > > HV resonant charging systems use charging chokes that have DC > > > resistance of hundreds of ohms or less. In the following > > calculations, > > > I used a custom spreadsheet that uses an underdamped RLC charging > > > circuit model, a "stiff" DC supply, and a dequeing diode (a > line-type > > > modulator circuit). > > > > > In all the following examples, the DC supply voltage was 10 kV, > tank > > > cap was 20 nF, and the system break rate was set to 250 BPS. For > > > comparison, we can compare performance to an "ideal" (lossless) DC > > > resonant charging system with a zero-ohm charging choke. In an > ideal > > > system, the tank cap would be charged to 2X the DC supply (or 20 > kV), > > > the tank bang energy would be 4 J, so the average tank output power > > at > > > 250 BPS would be 1000 watts. In general, increasing inductor > > resistance > > > reduces performance, while increasing inductance improves > > performance. > > > > This is sort of where I wound up. My application is running 7 small > > coils (3" secondary, 13nf Cpri) so fairly low power (~NST class) off a > > common supply (eventually with triggered gaps or something like that) > > > > > > I figured the $18 ignition coil, while having DC resistance might not be > > so bad in this application. And it's cheap! > > > > > > > > > > > Case 1 is for a sample ignition coil with resistance and inductance > > of > > > 10 k ohm and 30 H respectively. > > > Case 1: Example ignition coil: > > > Rcoil = 10 k ohm, Lcoil = 30 H, 250 BPS > > > Max break rate: 412 BPS > > > RMS charging current: ~ 49 mA (250 BPS) > > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 23.9 W > > > Tank cap max voltage: ~13.9 kV (~65% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > > Bang size: 1.71 J > > > Ave Tank power output: ~428 watts (~42% of ideal) > > > > If I cut the rms charging current in half, then the ohmic (and core) > > losses would be <10W, which is probably within the dissipation > > properties of the coil. (and it would be cheap to find out if it's not) > > > > > > > > > Suppose we instead used a "high-energy" cylindrical style non-CD > > > ignition coil such as a JEGS 555-40105 > > > ([1]https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1). This coil has > > less > > > than half the series resistance (4.7 k ohm) as Case 1. We'll also > > > assume it has the same inductance as before (30 H). > > > Case 2: High-Energy JEG coil: > > > Rcoil = 4.7 k ohm, Lcoil (assumed) = 30 H, 250 BPS > > > Max break rate: 414 BPS > > > RMS charging current: ~ 75 mA > > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 26.2 W > > > Tank cap max voltage: ~16.23 kV (~81% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > > Bang size: 2.63 J > > > Ave Tank power output: ~659 watts (~66% of ideal) > > > > > > > > > > yes - lower series R helps > > > > > The single JEG coil is significantly better than the sample coil. > > Let's > > > try two JEG coils in parallel to see how much more it improves the > > > results. > > > Case 3: Two JEG coils in parallel > > > Rcoil = 2.35 k ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > > > Max break rate: 586 BPS > > > RMS charging current: ~ 83 mA (250 BPS) > > > Ignition coil ohmic dissipation: 16.4 W > > > Tank cap max voltage: ~17.16 kV (~86% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > > Bang size: 2.94 J > > > Ave Tank power output: ~736 watts (~74% of ideal) > > > Finally, a comparison with a typical DC resonant charging choke is > > > shown below... > > > Case 4: Typical low-resistance custom DC resonant charging choke > > > Rcoil = 200 ohm, Lcoil = 15 H, 250 BPS: > > > Max break rate: 587 BPS > > > RMS charging current: ~ 106 mA (250 BPS) > > > Charging Choke ohmic dissipation: 2.3 W > > > Tank cap max voltage: ~19.38kV (~97% of 20 kV target voltage!) > > > Bang size: 3.76 J > > > Ave Tank power output: ~940 watts (~94% of ideal) > > > So, it looks like one or more ignition coils could indeed be used > as > > > charging chokes for 1-2 kW power coils assuming no core saturation > > > issues and at reduced efficiency. However, there may be advantages > to > > > sacrificing efficiency for the flexibility of a DC resonant > charging > > > system. Using cylindrical form factor (i.e., open core) should help > > to > > > prevent core saturation, and the secondary windings should be able > to > > > handle the RMS current at power levels shown in the above examples. > > You > > > could confirm if the secondary can handle the current by driving a > > > secondary from a HV DC source using the same DC current as the > > expected > > > RMS current in the charging system. > > > > Interesting, the "Coil in oil can" might be better from saturation > > properties. > > > > The core on those HEI coils doesn't look nearly as big as the core on > > the conventional coil I sawed open 25 years ago, but I could be > > misremembering. > > > > One could saw the core to gap it, too. A couple cuts and instantly, it's > > not a closed circuit any more. > > > > > > If you were to post your spreadsheet, that would be interesting. > > > > I'm building up a simple SPICE model but it's tedious - I'm not a "every > > day SPICE user" and getting all the diodes and switches (to simulate the > > gap) to work is, eh, tricky. > > > > There's plenty of "really nice" gap models out there (Analog Devices has > > one on their website) but I think they're sort of overkill for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bert > > > Lux, Jim wrote: > > > > > > On 2/13/23 2:58 AM, Joshua Thomas wrote: > > > > > > Funny you mention this, I have a classic coil (can shape, oil > > > filled) that > > > I was thinking how to use in a coil. Interested in what others > have > > > done. > > > > > > There's the GMHEICSLR (GM HEI coil spark length record) - running > > > off 110VAC with a triac - More than 30cm sparks, as I recall. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lux, Jim [2]<jim@luxfamily.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone tried using the secondary of an auto ignition coil as > a > > > charging inductor for a small coil? > > > They are 10-30 H (depending on who measured it, etc.) They've > got > > > the > > > HV insulation. > > > I was wondering about the current handling. Typically, they seem > > to > > > have a DC resistance of some 10 kOhm or more, and if you're > driving > > > from, say, a NST with an RMS output current of 30 mA, that works > > out > > > to > > > about 9-10 Watts dissipation (because I've not got a spice model > of > > > the > > > actual charging current, etc.) > > > Or, alternately, any source for 10 H inductors that can hold off > > > 20kV? > > > Short of winding my own. 200 or so turns on a 4 cm diameter core > > > with > > > mu=5000 would do it. Have to wind in 20 turn chunks to keep the > > > voltage > > > rating, reasonable, but that's doable. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Tesla mailing list -- [3]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [4]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Tesla mailing list -- [5]tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [6]tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > > > > -- > > > Bert Hickman > > > Stoneridge Engineering LLC > > > Woodridge, Illinois, USA > > > [7]http://www.capturedlightning.com > > > +1 630-964-2699 > > > *********************************************************************** > > > World's source for "Captured Lightning" Lichtenberg Figure sculptures, > > > magnetically "shrunken" coins, and scarce/out of print technical books > > > *********************************************************************** > > > > > > References > > > > > > 1. https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40105/10002/-1 > > > 2. mailto:jim@luxfamily.com > > > 3. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > > 4. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > 5. mailto:tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > > 6. mailto:tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > 7. http://www.capturedlightning.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list -- tcml@tcml.pupman.com > To unsubscribe send an email to tcml-leave@tcml.pupman.com >
LJ
Lux, Jim
Mon, Feb 13, 2023 11:54 PM

On 2/13/23 3:17 PM, Ronald Reeland wrote:

Here are a couple links to the Popular Electronics November 1999 issue
featuring Charles Rakes Tesla Coil article and plans:

https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Poptronics/90s/99/PE.1999-11.pdf

https://teslauniverse.com/build/plans/solid-state-tesla-coil-0

Ron Reeland

The LU800 coil referenced in the PopElectronics article is still
available. Around $15 depending on the source.

I have no idea what the electrical properties are, but I imagine it's a
fairly vanilla 12V coil.

On 2/13/23 3:17 PM, Ronald Reeland wrote: > Here are a couple links to the Popular Electronics November 1999 issue > featuring Charles Rakes Tesla Coil article and plans: > > https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Poptronics/90s/99/PE.1999-11.pdf > > https://teslauniverse.com/build/plans/solid-state-tesla-coil-0 > > Ron Reeland > The LU800 coil referenced in the PopElectronics article is still available. Around $15 depending on the source. I have no idea what the electrical properties are, but I imagine it's a fairly vanilla 12V coil.